Hey Stupid, your Epistemology is Showing...
Thursday, April 1, 2010 at 1:05PM People are stupid. All people. Myself included – I’m a people too. It’s a fact that makes me nuts. It’s aggravating because we’re not stupid based on an objective truth – we’re stupid based on our own working definition of knowledge. And that definition of knowledge makes us feel smart while actually defining us as stupid. Here’s how.
Most everyone I meet ‘knows’ stuff. They know all kinds of stuff. A lot of the people I meet want to tell me how much they know, and that’s fine because I like learning and hearing about stuff people like to learn and hear about. Then I know it. I learnt it. I’m smarter – right?
So then I tell them the stuff I know about, which happens to be pretty Jesusy. That’s the stuff I decided to spend my life learning about. Some people learn about finance and accounting, some learn about insurance and business, some people learn about gardening and the environment. I learn about faith and religion. So I share what I know.
Which usually leads to an evasion – ‘oh, you’re a pastor. Well, look at the time…’ Or a polite ‘yeah, Jesus is cool. That’s important stuff too.’ But sometimes I get a challenge – ‘I don’t believe that, it’s all just made up. The Bible and Christianity aren’t true. You can’t prove that it is.’
Then I say ‘your epistemology is showing’ and giggle like a school girl as they check their zipper. It’s much more fun than pointing out the obvious incongruity of their thinking and the fundamental lack of fundamental thought towards the subject of knowing things – fundamentally.
Epistemology is partially concerned with how we know what we know. There is internalism, externalism, blah, blah, blah. One thing we have to come to terms with, however, is that what we know is mostly not objective, empirical truth that we have unquestionably proven – but rather what we say we know is actually believed based on faith from what others have told us.
For instance, all of us KNOW that there was an earthquake in Haiti – but were we there? We KNOW that the earth is round, but have we been in space to see it? ‘There is footage’ you say, but I say images and video are able to be faked pretty well these days. For instance:

The earth is square. How do I know? Google images says so.
How do you know what you know about business? You went to college, took courses and professors or authors of textbooks told you. How do you know where your appendix is? WebMD has a nice graphic – they told me. Unless you cut yourself open and see it for yourself, you don’t really know it’s there apart from being told that it is.
Which is the other way, really, that we know what we know. We experience. I know that two plus one = three because we had two kids and then another ankle biter came along and there are now three butts to wipe in my house. I have experienced that math, and it stinks.
So every year I’m annoyed at all the people who ‘know’ what they know about Jesus around Easter. Have you ever noticed that the Discovery channel and the History channel always run some kind of story on a new twist in the Jesus story? This year it was something about how Jesus was set up – framed for a crime he didn’t commit. There was also a piece on the ‘real face of Jesus.’ Every year it’s something, some new thing we now know. If you watch it, however, it’s just some guy telling you something – something someone told him. Or in some cases, it’s something they are telling us for the first time, based on what society or culture is telling them.
So maybe you’re CONVINCED Christianity is a bunch of crap. Maybe you’re CERTAIN that Jesus wasn’t raised from the dead. Maybe you KNOW that this whole God, Jesus, church and Bible thing are all made up, historically contrived by generations of grumpy old republicans who want to control everyone, rule the world and be total buzzkills. Let me ask you something…
How do you know that?
Have you ever looked into it? Have you ever asked about how the Bible came into existence? It’s called the cannon of scripture, btw, and is an interesting topic. Adherents of historical criticism say they know what parts of scripture are true and what parts aren’t – how do they know? Who told them? They weren’t there to experience it, so somebody must have told them something about the Bible.
Do you think the story of the resurrection of Jesus is fabricated?
How do you know? You have two options – you were there and experienced it (as old and crotchety as some people I know are, still highly unlikely) or someone told you it is all fabricated. Who told you? Oprah? Eckhart Tolle? Tupac Shakur? How do they know? Who told them? Or are they claiming they were there?
The truth is, you don’t know. I don’t know. If knowing is a function of objective, observable, empirical truth not subjected to interpretation or influenced by cultural or other biases but rather based on firsthand experience, then most of us don’t know anything. With this criteria applied to knowing, we are all stupid, as I said at the beginning of this post. Actually, we simply use the terms believe and know interchangeably.
There is much I have not observed about Einstein’s or Newton’s theories of physics – but I believe them to be true. I act with great certainty on the basis that they are true – though I have never experienced the experiment that would prove them true. I believe because reputable people – teacher, professors, etc. – have told me they are true.
I believe that Jesus Christ lived, died and rose again. I believe he was God’s only son. I believe this to be true based on those who have told me it is so. Not just because my pastor or professors have said so, but rather because the vast weight of history has spoken thus. Those who did know him told others. They wrote it down. They spread the message. Generations of people said the same. Some people in the last few hundred years have started to say that those people were wrong, but they weren’t there. They weren’t part of the early church. They didn’t walk with Jesus – so how did we learn in the last hundred years all this new stuff about Jesus and the Bible? Scholars today who deny the resurrection don’t do so because people who were there at the time of the authorship of the Bible told them. People who reject that Jesus wasn’t God’s son today don’t do so because they knew him firsthand. Those who reject and deny do so because people today tell them so. Maybe you have a pastor who denies Jesus’ resurrection – who told him that? Not the last 2000 of Christian scholarship. Not the Bible. Who told them?
Who is the authority that told you what you know? Who is the scholar? Or is it just a subconscious undercurrent of the culture and society? If so, how does the culture and society know what they know? Who or what informs them? To keep pulling back the onion peels to see who told who – how we know what we know – is a really fun epistemological exercise.
And epistemology will take you many places. It forces you to question all kinds of things you assumed were objective truths. For instance, everyone I know will openly state that we should be good – but epistemology forces us to ask how we know what good is? And if there is a different people group who defines good differently, how do we know that what we know about good is better or more correct than what they know is good? Confused yet? Good. Let’s cut to it.
Easter is coming up on Sunday. I know what I know. You know what you know. Maybe those things are very different. Maybe they are diametrically opposed. I know how I know what I know. Do you? What do you know about Easter? Really, what do you believe about it?
Just please, don’t assert that the only things we do know are objective, observable, empirical truths not subjected to interpretation or influenced by cultural or other biases. That would make us all stupid.
Oh, and by the way, your epidermis is showing.

